4.5 Article

Oculomotor Anomalies in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence for Deficits in Response Preparation and Inhibition

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181a565f1

关键词

eye movement; inhibitory control; executive function; visual attention; frontal

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD-24061]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS050153, AS 35359, R01 NS043480, R01 NS047781, K02 NS044850]
  3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Instirute for Clinical and Translational Research [UL1-RR025005]
  4. National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine patterns of executive and oculomotor control in a group of both boys and girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: Cross-sectional study of 120 children aged 8 to 12 years, including 60 with ADHD (24 girls) and 60 typically developing controls (29 girls). Oculomotor paradigms included visually guided saccades (VGS), antisaccades, memory-guided saccades, and a go/no-go test, with variables of interest emphasizing response preparation, response inhibition, and working memory. Results: As a group, children with ADHD demonstrated significant deficits in oculomotor response preparation (VGS latency and variability) and response inhibition but not working memory. Girls, but not boys with ADHD, had significantly longer VGS latencies, even after controlling for differences in ADHD symptom severity. The ADHD subtypes did not differ on response preparation or inhibition measures; however, children with the Inattentive subtype were less accurate on the working memory task than those with the Combined subtype. Conclusions: Sex differences in children with ADHD extend beyond symptom presentation to the development of oculomotor control. Saccade latency may represent a specific deficit among girls with ADHD. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2009;48(7):749-756.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据