4.5 Article

Green's function retrieval through cross-correlations in a two-dimensional complex reverberating medium

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 135, 期 3, 页码 1034-1043

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.4864485

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU network QUEST through a Marie Curie grant
  2. Perspective Research Scholarship from the Swiss National Science Foundation [PBEZP2_145960]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBEZP2_145960] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cross-correlations of ambient noise averaged at two receivers lead to the reconstruction of the two-point Green's function, provided that the wave-field is uniform azimuthally, and also temporally and spatially uncorrelated. This condition depends on the spatial distribution of the sources and the presence of heterogeneities that act as uncorrelated secondary sources. This study aims to evaluate the relative contributions of source distribution and medium complexity in the two-point cross-correlations by means of numerical simulations and laboratory experiments in a finite-size reverberant two-dimensional (2D) plate. The experiments show that the fit between the cross-correlation and the 2D Green's function depends strongly on the nature of the source used to excite the plate. A turbulent air-jet produces a spatially uncorrelated acoustic field that rapidly builds up the Green's function. On the other hand, extracting the Green's function from cross-correlations of point-like sources requires more realizations and long recordings to balance the effect of the most energetic first arrivals. When the Green's function involves other arrivals than the direct wave, numerical simulations confirm the better Green's function reconstruction with a spatially uniform source distribution than the typical contour-like source distribution surrounding the receivers that systematically gives rise to spurious phases. (C) 2014 Acoustical Society of America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据