4.5 Article

North Pacific right whale up-call source levels and propagation distance on the southeastern Bering Sea shelf

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 129, 期 6, 页码 4047-4054

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.3557060

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center/National Marine Mammal Laboratory (AFSC/NMML) via JIMO Budget [NA17RJ1231]
  2. North Pacific Marine Research Institute [T-2100]
  3. North Pacific Research Board [R-0307, F0519]
  4. Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) [T-1-6-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Call source levels, transmission loss, and ambient noise levels were estimated for North Pacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica) up-calls recorded in the southeastern Bering Sea in autumn of 2000 and 2001. Distances to calling animals, needed to estimate source levels, were based on two independent techniques: (1) arrival-time differences on three or more hydrophones and (2) shallow-water dispersion of normal modes on a single receiver. Average root-mean-square (rms) call source levels estimated by the two techniques were 178 and 176 dB re 1 mu Pa at 1 m, respectively, over the up-call frequency band, which was determined per call and averaged 90 to 170 Hz. Peak-to-peak source levels were 14 to 22 dB greater than rms levels. Transmission loss was approximately 15*log(10)(range), intermediate between cylindrical and spherical spreading. Ambient ocean noise within the up-call band varied from 72 to 91 dB re 1 mu Pa-2/Hz. Under average noise conditions, call spectrograms were detectable for whales at distances up to 100 km, but propagation and detection distance may vary depending on environmental parameters and anthropogenic noise. Obtaining distances to animals and acoustic detection range is a step toward using long-term passive acoustic recordings to estimate abundance for this critically endangered whale population. (C) 2011 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3557060]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据