4.5 Article

In vivo ultrasonic attenuation slope estimates for detecting cervical ripening in rats:: Preliminary results

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 123, 期 3, 页码 1794-1800

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.2832317

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA111289] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R37 EB002641] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINR NIH HHS [P30 NR009014-05, P30 NR009014] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To effectively postpone preterm birth, cervical ripening needs to be detected and delayed. As the cervix ripens, the spacing between the collagen fibers increases and fills with water, hyaluronan, decorin, and enzymes suggesting that the ultrasonic attenuation of the cervix should decrease. The decrease in ultrasonic attenuation may be detectable, leading to an effective means of detecting cervical ripening. Herein, the traditional attenuation slope-estimation algorithm based on measuring the downshift in center frequency of the ultrasonic backscattered signal with propagation depth was modified and applied to the cervix of rats. The modified algorithm was verified using computer simulations and an ex vivo tissue sample before being evaluated in in vivo animal studies. Spherically-focused f/3 transducers with 33-MHz center frequencies and with 9-mm focal lengths were used in both the simulations and experiments. The accuracy was better than 15% in the simulations, and the attenuation slope of the cervix in the ex vivo experiment was 2.6 +/- 0.6 dB/cm-MHz, which is comparable to 2.5 +/- 0.4 dB/cm-MHz measured using a through-trans mission insertion loss technique. For the in vivo experiments, a statistically significant effect of ultrasonic attenuation with gestational age was not observed. The large variances in the in vivo results were most likely due to the natural variation in attenuation for biological tissue between animals. (C) 2008 Acoustical Society of America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据