4.6 Article

Radiesse: Advanced Techniques and Applications for a Unique and Versatile Implant

期刊

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 136, 期 5, 页码 164-170

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001825

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Radiesse is a well-tolerated facial injectable with unique filling and lifting capabilities. Although initially approved for facial volumizing in HIV-related lipodystrophy patients, it quickly gained wide acceptance for aesthetic facial rejuvenation. In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration has approved several new indications for its use. This synopsis presents the experience and injection techniques currently favored by the primary author after many years of use in thousands of patients. Methods: The anecdotal practice of an experienced injector is presented along with the current Food and Drug Administration-approved standards of Radiesse injection. Results: Radiesse has many on- and off-label applications that can be thoughtfully incorporated into clinical practice. Its unique chemical composition allows for immediate lifting and filling with long-term collagen stimulation. The product can be reconstituted to increase its versatility and minimize adverse events. Injections can be performed in the supraperiosteal space and the subcutaneous layer and are best administered in small, calculated doses to prevent nodules or vascular occlusion. Various techniques for Radiesse injection in specific areas are discussed in detail. Conclusions: Radiesse is a versatile injectable implant and a valuable tool for short- and long-term cosmetic and reconstructive treatments. In addition to various off-label uses, this injectable is often used in conjunction with botox, other injectables, collagen stimulators and tightening devices. A customized reconstitution of product increases its versatility for natural appearing and long lasting results that are both economical and effective for full facial rejuvenation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据