4.4 Article

Glutathione-Protected Hierarchical Colorimetric Response of Gold Nanoparticles: a Simple Assay for Creatinine Rapid Detection by Resonance Light Scattering Technique

期刊

PLASMONICS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 1107-1114

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11468-015-9907-4

关键词

Creatinine; Gold nanoparticles; Glutathione; Hierarchical colorimetric detecting; Resonance light scattering

资金

  1. Shantou University [NTF10002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2011010005208]
  3. Guangdong High Education Fund of Science and Technology Innovation [2013KJCX0078]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272152/E0208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although numerous methods have been reported for the analysis of creatinine in human serum, the development of a simple, rapid, and practical sensor still remains a great challenge. In this work, a hierarchical colorimetric sensor was demonstrated based on the anti-aggregation effect of glutathione (GSH)-protected gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Creatinine molecule could induce the aggregation of AuNPs, and the system could show blue color simultaneously. When GSH was added to incubate with AuNPs in advance, the solution could perform a hierarchical color change corresponding to different concentration of creatinine. Consequently, the change of AuNPs in size resulted in the difference of resonance light scattering (RLS) intensity and the quantitative detection of creatinine could be achieved. Meanwhile, the determination of creatinine in human serum could be attained with a detection limit of 1.21 mu M, and the colorimetric sensor could be applied to detect creatinine in human serum successfully in a wide range from 10 to 1000 mu M. As above, the creatinine in human serum could be distinguished using proper concentration of GSH. More practically, we could identify if the sample exceeded or below the critical value with our naked eye. This sensing proposal was accompanied with prominent simplicity, speediness, and practicability clinically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据