4.3 Article

From Carboniferous to Recent: wing venation enlightens evolution of thysanopteran lineage

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 385-399

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2011.598578

关键词

Lophioneuridae; Paraneoptera; phylogeny; Thripida; Thysanoptera; Westphalothripidesidae fam. nov.

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [P210/10/0633]
  2. Ministry of Schools [MSM 0021620828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent Thysanoptera are characterized by two pairs of slender wings fringed by long hairs and with reduced venation. Fossils presenting more complete venation have been used in earlier studies to link Thysanoptera to 'Zoropsocinae', which form with 'Lophioneurinae' the 'Lophioneuridae', an extinct family of the superorder Thripida. On the basis of one new Carboniferous fossil described herein, Westphalothripides oudardi sp. nov. (Westphalothripidesidae fam. nov.), as well as new Cretaceous fossils, we revise the current interpretation of venation in Thripida and propose new cladistic analyses, which divide this superorder into three clades: Panthysanoptera nov. (including 'Zoropsocidae' stat. rest. and Thysanoptera), Lophioneurida (including 'Lophioneurinae' and Moundthripidae), and Westphalothripidesidae. We confirm that the Thysanoptera belong to the superorder Thripida but show that 'Lophioneuridae' are paraphyletic. Thanks to the venation observed in fossils, we describe a new character of the wing in some Recent species which allows them to be integrated in phylogenetic studies. Results show two clades inside Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae + Melanthripidae + Merothripidae, and Thripidae + Stenurothripidae + Fauriellidae. Phlaeothripidae could not be studied due to the absence of the diagnostic wing veins in this family. We discuss the appearance of Thripida within Paraneoptera and particularly the importance of one apomorphy, the reduction of the right mandible as a putative adaptation to spore and pollen piercing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据