4.2 Article

Carbon K-edge spectra of carbonate minerals

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 676-682

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0909049510020029

关键词

carbon; XANES; spectroscopy; carbonate minerals; identification; orientation effects; calcium L-edge XANES; sequestration

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF OCE-0526178, -0221295]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0849474] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0221295] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon K-edge X-ray spectroscopy has been applied to the study of a wide range of organic samples. from polymers and coals to interstellar dust particles. Identification of carbonaceous materials within these samples is accomplished by the pattern of resonances in the 280-320 eV energy region Carbonate minerals are often encountered in the study of natural samples, and have been identified by a distinctive resonance at 290.3 eV. Here C K-edge and Ca L-edge spectra from a range of carbonate minerals are presented Although all carbonates exhibit a sharp 29(1 eV resonance, both the precise position of this resonance and the positions of other resonances vary among minerals The relative strengths of the different carbonate resonances also vary with crystal orientation to the linearly polarized X-ray beam. Intriguingly, several carbonate minerals also exhibit a strong 288 6 eV resonance, consistent with the position of a carbonyl resonance rather than carbonate Calcite and aragonite, although indistinguishable spectrally at the C K-edge. exhibited significantly different spectra at the Ca L-edge The distinctive spectral fingerprints of carbonates provide an identification tool, allowing for the examination of such processes as carbon sequestration in minerals. Mn substitution in marine calcium carbonates (dolomitization) and serpentinization of basalts

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据