4.5 Article

The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and transfusion in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 186, 期 1, 页码 318-327

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.08.020

关键词

Tranexamic acid; Blood loss; Transfusion; Meta-analysis

类别

资金

  1. Anhui Medical University [2013xkj045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Conflicting reports have been published regarding the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on reducing blood loss and transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TXA treatment in reducing blood loss and transfusion in major orthopedic surgery. Materials and methods: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies. Only randomized controlled trials were eligible for this study. The weighted mean difference in blood loss, number of transfusions per patient, and the summary risk ratio of transfusion and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were calculated in the TXA-treated group and the control group. Results: A total of 46 randomized controlled trials involving 2925 patients were included. The use of TXA reduced total blood loss by a mean of 408.33 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], -505.69 to -310.77), intraoperative blood loss by a mean of 125.65 mL (95% CI, -182.58 to -68.72), postoperative blood loss by a mean of 214.58 mL (95% CI, -274.63 to -154.52), the number of blood transfusions per patient by 0.78 U (95% CI, -0.19 to -0.37), and the volumes of blood transfusions per patient by 205.33 mL (95% CI, -301.37 to -109.28). TXA led to a significant reduction in transfusion requirements (relative risk, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46 -0.56), and no increase in the risk of DVT (relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.79). Conclusions: TXA significantly reduced blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, and did not appear to increase the risk of DVT. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据