4.5 Article

Blood transfusion products contain mitochondrial DNA damage-associated molecular patterns: a potential effector of transfusion-related acute lung injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 191, 期 2, 页码 286-289

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.003

关键词

TRALI; Transfusion-related acute lung injury; Mitochondria; ARDS; Transfusion; Damage-associated molecular patterns; DAMP

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL058234, R01 HL113614]
  2. American Heart Association [14CRP19010032, 13POST14780019]
  3. American College of Surgeons (Clowes Award)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is the most frequent and severe complication in patients receiving multiple blood transfusions. Current pathogenic concepts hold that proinflammatory mediators present in transfused blood products are responsible for the initiation of TRALI, but the identity of the critical effector molecules is yet to be determined. We hypothesize that mtDNA damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are present in blood transfusion products, which may be important in the initiation of TRALI. Methods: DNA was extracted from consecutive samples of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets procured from the local blood bank. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify approximate to 200 bp sequences from the COX1, ND1, ND6, and D-loop regions of the mitochondrial genome. Results: A range of mtDNA DAMPs were detected in all blood components measured, with FFP displaying the largest variation. Conclusions: We conclude that mtDNA DAMPs are present in packed red blood cells, FFP, and platelets. These observations provide proof of the concept that mtDNA DAMPs may be mediators of TRALI. Further studies are needed to test this hypothesis and to determine the origin of mtDNA DAMPs in transfused blood. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据