4.5 Article

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio changes predict small hepatocellular carcinoma survival

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 192, 期 2, 页码 402-408

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.078

关键词

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Milan criteria; Prognostic factor; Liver resection

类别

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2012ZX10002-016, 2012ZX10002-017]
  2. Scientific and Technological Support Project of Sichuan Province [2013SZ0032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is limited information available concerning the delta neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (Delta NLR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study was designed to evaluate the predictive value of dynamic change of NLR in patients who undergo curative resection for small HCC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to analyze 189 patients with small HCC who underwent curative resection between February 2007 and March 2012. Patient data were retrieved from our prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (NLR increased, n = 80) and group B (NLR decreased, n = 109). Demographic and clinical data, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were statistically compared and a multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors. Results: The 1, 3, and 5-y OS in group A was 92.7, 70.0, and 53.0%, respectively, and 96.2, 87.5, and 75.9%, respectively, for group B (P - 0.003); The corresponding 1, 3, and 5-y RFS was 58.7, 37.9, 21.8, and 81.2%, 58.5% and 53.8% for groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested that Delta NLR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (P = 0.004, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.637, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.356-5.128) and RFS (P < 0.001, HR = 2.372, 95% CI 1.563-3.601). Conclusions: Increased NLR, but not high preoperative NLR or postoperative NLR, helps to predict worse OS and RFS in patients with small HCC who underwent curative resection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据