4.5 Article

Effects of azithromycin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 183, 期 2, 页码 767-776

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.003

关键词

Burn; Burn wound; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Thermal injury; Azithromycin; Tobramycin; Ciprofloxacin; Biofilm; Drug-drug interaction; Cystic fibrosis

类别

资金

  1. US Department of Defense [DR080371]
  2. NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSI Grant [KL2 TR000156]
  3. NIAID [R01AI067653]
  4. National Institutes of Health [1R01HL090991]
  5. Rebecca Runyon Bryan Chair for Cystic Fibrosis
  6. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cutaneous thermal injuries (i.e., burns) remain a common form of debilitating trauma, and outcomes are often worsened by wound infection with environmental bacteria, chiefly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Materials and methods: We tested the effects of early administration of a single dose of azithromycin, with or without subsequent antipseudomonal antibiotics, in a mouse model of standardized thermal injury infected with P aeruginosa via both wound site and systemic infection. We also tested the antimicrobial effects of these antibiotics alone or combined in comparative biofilm and planktonic cultures in vitro. Results: In our model, early azithromycin administration significantly reduced wound and systemic infection without altering wound site or circulating neutrophil activity. The antimicrobial effect of azithromycin was additive with ciprofloxacin but significantly reduced the antimicrobial effect of tobramycin. This pattern was reproduced in biofilm cultures and not observed in planktonic cultures of P aeruginosa. Conclusion: These data suggest that early administration of azithromycin following burn-related trauma and infection may reduce P aeruginosa infection and potential interactions with other antibiotics should be considered when designing future studies. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据