4.5 Article

Enhancing Melanoma Treatment with Resveratrol

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 172, 期 1, 页码 109-115

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.033

关键词

melanoma; resveratrol; melphalan; temozolomide

类别

资金

  1. Duke Melanoma Research Fund
  2. Duke University Department of Surgery
  3. VA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Resveratrol (RESV) is a naturally occurring compound that possesses anti-cancer capabilities. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential of RESV as an adjunct to chemotherapy in melanoma treatment. Methods. The in vitro and in vivo cytotoxic activity of RESV with or without chemotherapy was tested using cellular assays and a xenograft model. Two Duke melanoma cell lines (DM738, DM443) were used for both in vivo and in vitro experiments, and two nonmalignant human fibroblast lines (NHDF, HS68) were used for in vitro cellular assays. Xenografts were randomized to treatment arms and tumors measured to evaluate response. Results were analyzed using a Student's t-test and ANOVA. Western blots were performed on in vivo tissue. Results. In vitro RESV significantly decreased melanoma cell viability in all lines tested (all P < 0.0001). Treatment of fibroblast cell lines revealed that RESV selectively spared NHDF and HS68 cells compared with its cytotoxic effects on melanoma cells (P < 0.0001). Treatment of malignant cells with 50 mu M RESV and temozolomide (TMZ) for 72 h significantly enhanced cytotoxicity compared with treatment with TMZ alone (P < 0.0001). In vivo, however, there was no significant difference between any treatment arms (P = 0.65). Conclusion. RESV shows promise as a novel therapeutic in the management of melanoma for its selective anti-tumor activity in vitro. Translating in vitro results to in vivo models has proven difficult. Barriers thought to prevent such translation are identified, and a rationale for overcoming them is discussed. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据