4.5 Article

Volatile anesthetic preconditioning attenuated sepsis induced lung inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 E17-E23

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.037

关键词

Isoflurane; Sevoflurane; Lung injury

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the differential protective effects of isoflurane or sevoflurane on lung inflammation in a rat model of cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) induced sepsis. Methods: Seventy-two rats were assigned to control, sevoflurane, or isoflurane groups. At 2 and 4 h, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), nitrate/nitrate levels (NO), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were determined. At 12 and 24 h, malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and histologic changes were evaluated. Survival was monitored for 7 d after CLP. Results: Sevoflurane (75%) and isoflurane (63%) significantly improved survival rate compared with control rats (38%). When sevoflurane and isoflurane groups were compared, sevoflurane pretreatment showed significant decrease in NO at 2 h [1045 (803-1274)/1570 (1174-2239) and 4 h [817 (499-1171)/1493 (794-2080)]; increase in TAC at 4 h [580.0 (387-751)/320 (239-512)]; decrease in MDA at 12 h [2.5 (1.1-4.2)/5.4 (4-73)] and 24 h [10.8 (6.0-14.0)/15.9 (9-28)]; and decrease in MPO at 24 h [145.8 (81-260)/232 (148-346)]. The difference in the ICAM-1 expression of the isoflurane and sevoflurane groups was not significant at both measurement times. The architectural integrity of the alveoli was preserved in all the groups. The injury scores of the three groups at 12 and 24 h did not show any significant difference. Conclusions: Both sevoflurane and isoflurane attenuated inflammatory response, lipid peroxidation, and oxidative stress. Furthermore, sevoflurane was more effective in modulating sepsis induced inflammatory response at the chosen concentration in sepsis model. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据