4.5 Article

Apigenin Down-Regulates the Hypoxia Response Genes: HIF-1α, GLUT-1, and VEGF in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 167, 期 2, 页码 173-181

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.041

关键词

apigenin; hypoxia; pancreatic cancer; GLUT-1; HIF-1 alpha; VEGF

类别

资金

  1. IDP Foundation
  2. Nathan & Isabel Miller Family Foundation [K12-RR017707-05]
  3. American Cancer Society-Illinois Division [O5-45]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The flavonoid apigenin exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic activities. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of apigenin on hypoxia responsive genes important in pancreatic cancer cell proliferation. Materials and Methods. Immunohistochemistry for GLUT-1 expression was conducted on human pancreatic cancer samples and adjacent controls. Real-time RT-PCR, Western blot analysis, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were conducted on CD18 and S2-013 human pancreatic cancer cells treated with apigenin (0-50 mM) in normoxic and hypoxic conditions to evaluate HIF-1 alpha, GLUT-1, and VEGF mRNA and protein expression and secretion. Results. GLUT-1 expression was significantly increased in pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples versus adjacent controls (P < 0.001). Hypoxic conditions induced HIF-1 alpha, GLUT-1, and VEGF protein expression in both CD18 and S2-013 pancreatic cancer cells. Apigenin (50 mM) blocked hypoxia induced up-regulation of all three proteins in both cell lines. Apigenin also impeded hypoxia-mediated induction of GLUT-1 and VEGF mRNA in both cell lines (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Apigenin inhibits HIF-1 alpha, GLUT-1, and VEGF mRNA and protein expression in pancreatic cancer cells in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. This may account for the mechanism of apigenin's anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects and further supports the potential of apigenin as a future chemopreventive agent for pancreatic cancer. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据