4.5 Article

High Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Level in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Specimens Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 159, 期 2, 页码 689-695

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.09.020

关键词

chemokine receptor CXCR4; triple - negative breast cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction. Basal-like tumors or triple negative breast cancers are those that lack hormone-receptor and HER-2 expressions. They are considered to be aggressive tumors, and molecular mechanism to account for this is poorly understood. CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor that has been linked to breast cancer invasion and metastasis. We postulate that high CXCR4 overexpression level in cancer specimens predicts a poor outcome in patients with triple negative breast cancers. Methods. One hundred fifty-one patients with triple negative breast cancers were prospectively accrued and analyzed. All had undergone standardized treatment and surveillance protocols. From each specimen, CXCR4 levels were detected using Western blots. Results were quantified against 1 mu g of HeLa cells (positive controls). CXCR4 expression was defined as high (>= 6-fold) or low ( <6-fold). Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. Results. At a median follow-up of 37 mo, patients whose tumors had high CXCR4 overexpression (>= 6-fold) had a significantly higher incidence of cancer recurrence (P = 0.014) and cancer-related death (P = 0.026) than those in the low CXCR4 group ( <6-fold). After adjusting for tumor size and nodal status, the relative risk for cancer recurrence and death in the high CXCR4 group was 2.1-fold (P = 0.007; 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.8) and 2-fold (P = 0.047; 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.06) higher than those in the low CXCR4 group, respectively. Conclusion. High CXCR4 overexpression in cancer specimens predicts a worse outcome in patients who have triple negative breast cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据