4.5 Article

Inflammatory Consequences of Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Low-Pressure Ventilation

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 153, 期 2, 页码 295-301

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.022

关键词

apoptosis; inflammation; lung ischemia reperfusion injury; mechanical ventilation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI) is a clinical problem observed during thoracic surgery, and adversely affects patient recovery. A better understanding of the mechanisms of LIRI could be helpful to develop new therapeutic strategies. The objective was to assess the inflammatory and apoptotic consequences of LIRI using an in vivo rat model. Materials and methods. The left lung of Sprague-Dawley rats was subjected to ischemia for 120 min and reperfusion for up to 4 h. Ventilated controls underwent sham surgery and low-pressure mechanical ventilation for the above mentioned time points. Lung tissue was analyzed for histopathology and for the expression of inflammatory and apoptotic mediators. Results. Low-pressure ventilated controls showed a clear increase in myeloperoxidase activity, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, interleukin-6, and caspase-3 expression compared with naive animals. However, LIRI animals showed faster kinetics of pulmonal myeloperoxidase activity and caspase-3 expression. Moreover, only LIRI animals showed increased inducible nitric oxide synthase and interleukin-6 expression and had a decreased interleukin-10 expression in the lung compared to ventilated controls. Furthermore, lungs of LIRI animals contained much more cellular infiltrates compared with ventilated controls. Conclusions. Low-pressure mechanical ventilation induces an inflammatory response in the lung, but LIRI accelerates the kinetics of granulocyte infiltration and apoptosis. Moreover, LIRI skews the cytokine balance to a pro-inflammatory profile. Finally, LIRI deteriorates lung histology much more than ventilation only. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据