4.5 Article

The Effect of Surgical Margins on Outcomes for Low Grade MPNSTs and Atypical Neurofibroma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 110, 期 7, 页码 813-816

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23736

关键词

MPNST; neurofibromatosis; nerve sheath tumor; atypical neurofibroma; low grade MPNST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and ObjectivesWhile convention defines atypical neurofibroma as benign and low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) as malignant, sparse outcomes data exist for these tumors. This study reviews clinical outcomes of surgically resected low-grade MPNST and atypical neurofibroma, focusing on the effect of surgical margins on outcome. MethodsThis study is a retrospective review of 23 patients who underwent surgical resection of a low-grade MPNST or atypical neurofibroma. Treatment characteristics of adjuvant therapy and surgical margin were noted. Endpoints of local recurrence, presence of metastatic disease, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were reviewed. ResultsEighteen of 23 patients (78%) had microscopically positive margins on the resection. Disease-specific survival was 100% for both atypical neurofibroma patients and those with low-grade MPNST, regardless of surgical margin. Local recurrence in terms of recurrence of measureable disease occurred in 2/12 (16.7%) of LGMPNST patients and 1/11 (9.1%) of atypical NF patients, all of whom had microscopically positive surgical margins. ConclusionsIn a study dedicated exclusively to intermediate nerve sheath tumors, no patients developed metastatic disease nor died of disease despite a high rate of microscopically positive surgical margins (78%). While positive margins did lead to increased rates of local recurrence, these data suggest that surgeons potentially can temper their zeal for negative surgical margins in the setting of low-grade MPNST and atypical neurofibroma, as surgical morbidity may be more important than a presumed survival benefit of wide resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 110:813-816. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据