4.5 Article

Brain, the Last Fortress of Sarcoma: Similar Dismal Outcome But Discrepancy of Timing of Brain Metastasis in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 104, 期 7, 页码 765-770

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.22011

关键词

alveolar soft part sarcoma; brain metastasis; osteosarcoma; soft tissue sarcoma

资金

  1. Department of Health, Taiwan (Center of Excellence for Cancer Research at Taipei Veterans General Hospital) [DOH99-TD-C-111-007, DOH100-TD-C-111-007]
  2. Taiwan Clinical Oncology Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: Brain metastasis is a rare but dismal event in sarcomas. However, the pattern of occurrence and the prognostic factors associated with post-brain metastasis survival (PBMS) are not yet well-characterized. Methods: Sarcoma patients treated at one institute within 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed and those with brain metastasis were identified. The incidence of brain metastasis was demonstrated by case per person-years and cumulative incidence curves. Univariate factors associated with PBMS were analyzed. Results: Among 611 sarcoma patients, 20 (3.3%) developed brain metastasis. Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and osteosarcoma were the most common subtypes. Overall, the cumulative incidence was 3.9% at 5 years and 8.4% at 10 years. However, the incidence in STS patients continued to rise up to 10 years after primary diagnosis, whereas it reached a plateau in bone sarcoma patients at 3 years. Median PBMS was 1.67 months. Univariate factors associated with better PBMS included ASPS histology, initial surgical treatment, and brain irradiation for non-surgically treated patients. Conclusion: Our study revealed a discrepancy in the timing of occurrence of brain metastasis between STS and bone sarcoma. However, patients with brain metastasis had a poor prognosis, implicating the brain as the last fortress of sarcoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011;104:765-770. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据