4.5 Article

Downregulation of Stathmin Is Involved in Malignant Phenotype Reversion and Cell Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 103, 期 7, 页码 704-715

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21870

关键词

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; stathmin; cell cycle; apoptosis; RNA interference

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [072102310054]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Education Department of Henan Province [2010A310008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives: Stathmin plays a critical role in the regulation of mitosis and mediates the development of malignant tumors. Here, we investigated the potential role of stathmin in cell cycle and apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A stathmin short hairpin RNA (shRNA) plasmid was employed to downregulate stathmin expression in the ESCC cell line EC9706 cells. Cell proliferation was measured by cell counting, MTT, and colony formation assay. Cell migration was measured by Boyden chamber. Western blot was used to analyze the expressions of stathmin, survivin, and apoptosis-related proteins in transfected cells. Cell cycle and apoptosis were determined by flow cytometry and DNA ladder. Oncogenicity assay in nude mice was utilized to analyze phenotypic changes of transfected cells in vivo. Results: After transfection with stathmin shRNA plasmid, stathmin expression markedly decreased in EC9706 cells. Stathmin downregulation significantly inhibited cell proliferation, cell migration in vitro, and tumorigenicity in vivo, meanwhile arrested cell cycle in the G2/M phase and induced cell apoptosis. Further, stathmin downregulation resulted in downregulation of Bcl-2 and survivin proteins, activation of Caspase-3. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that stathmin may play an essential role in carcinogenesis of ESCC, which will lay a foundation for target therapy of ESCC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011;103:704-715. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据