4.5 Article

Prognostic Significance of Downregulated Expression of Programmed Cell Death 5 in Chondrosarcoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 102, 期 7, 页码 838-843

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21730

关键词

Programmed Cell Death 5; prognostic significance; chondrosarcoma

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [30871263, 30571870]
  2. National Key New Drug Creation Program of China [2009ZX09102-242]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02A305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives: Programmed Cell Death 5 (PDCD5) is a novel apoptosis-related gene and deregulation of PDCD5 is involved in tumorigenicity. This study was designed to investigate the expression level of PDCD5 and to clarify its clinical significance in chondrosarcoma. Methods: The mRNA and protein levels of PDCD5 in chondrosarcoma and matched corresponding non-tumor tissues were evaluated by real-time PCR and Western blot. respectively. The expression of PDCD5 protein was investigated by immunohistochemistry assays in chondrosarcoma, and its association with clinicopathologic factors and overall survival was also analyzed. Results: The mRNA and protein levels of PDCD5 were significantly decreased in chondrosarcoma compared with corresponding non-tumor tissues. Low expression of PDCD5 protein was 61.8% (21/34) in chondrosarcomas, as compared 12.5% (1/8) in normal bones, as well as compared 23.5% (4/17) in benign cartilage tumors. PDCD5 expression was correlated with anatomical location and histological grade. The survival rate of patients with low-PDCD5 tumors was lower than that of patients with high-PDCD5 tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the downregulated expression of PDCD5 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Conclusions: PDCD5 is downregulated in chondrosarcoma and might be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival of chondrosarcoma patients. J. Surg. Oncol, 2010;102:838-843. (C)2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据