4.5 Article

Patient Expectations for Surgical Outcome in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 375-381

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21301

关键词

patient expectations; functional outcome; extremity sarcoma

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CRT 43818]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives: Patients' expectations regarding their surgical recovery can significantly influence health Outcomes. This study examines the relationship between pre-treatment outcome expectations and post-operative function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). Additionally, we evaluate predictors of patients' outcome expectations. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on 157 ESTS patients (62% male, mean age 56 years) treated with limb-preservation surgery between January 2001 and February 2005. Associations between patients' outcome expectations and 1-year function and HRQoL Outcomes were evaluated using multivariable regression analyses. Factors predicting patient expectations were investigated using multinomial logistic regression. Results: Patients expecting a difficult recovery and patients with uncertain expectations had worse functional outcomes than patients anticipating an easy recovery. Education, dispositional optimism, tumor location, AJCC stage, and baseline function/HRQoL were significant predictors of patient expectations. For example, patients with primary school education more frequently reported uncertain expectations regarding length of recovery (OR = 20; 95% CI, 3.7-108.6) and complications (OR = 12; 95% CI, 2.7-58.0) than patients with post-secondary education. Conclusions: Patient expectations significantly influence functional outcome in ESTS. Patients at risk for uncertain expectations may benefit from additional, individualized education so as to optimize their treatment outcomes. J Surg. Oncol. 2009;100:37.5-381. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据