4.5 Article

Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lithium-ion battery electrolytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 216-222

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.07.014

关键词

Lithium-ion battery electrolyte; Battery separators; Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE); Supercritical carbon dioxide (sc CO2) extraction; Electrolyte aging; Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)

资金

  1. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety [16EM1025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different separator materials (polyethylene fleece - Freudenberg 2190 and porous glass fiber - Whatman (R) GF/D) and two different lithium-ion battery electrolytes have been investigated regarding their behavior in an autoclave extraction with supercritical helium head pressure carbon dioxide (Sc HHPCO2). Mixtures of dimethyl carbonate (DMC)/ethylene carbonate (EC) and ethylmethyl carbonate (EMC)/EC, each with 1 mol/L LiPF6 were used. In addition to these proof of principle experiments, the developed extraction method was further applied to real battery samples. Commercial 18650 cells (after formation and aging) were opened and the jelly roll was extracted with sc HHPCO2. Extracts were analyzed with gas and ion chromatography (GC, IC). Recovery rates and extract compositions strongly depend on the material of which the electrolyte is extracted. Further structure determination of electrolyte aging products was performed with different ionization modes in GC mass spectrometry (GC MS) experiments. Diethyl carbonate (DEC), dimethyl-2,5-dioxahexane dicarboxylate (DMDOHC), ethylmethyl-2,5-dioxahexane dicarboxylate (EMDOHC) and diethyl-2,5-dioxahexane dicarboxylate (DEDOHC) are aging products of electrolyte degradation which were successfully extracted and identified. Their concentrations correlate with solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth on the negative electrode which was investigated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据