4.5 Article

Supercritical fluid extraction of phenolic compounds from Eucalyptus globulus Labill bark

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 71-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2012.07.004

关键词

Eucalyptus globulus; Bark; Phenolic compounds; Supercritical fluid extraction; Optimization; Design of experiments

资金

  1. 7th Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 [CP-IP 228589-2]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia within the Programa Operacional Potencial Humano (POPH) of QREN [SFRH/BD/42021/2007, BPD/UI89/4520/2009]
  3. Associate Lab CICECO [Pest-C/CTM/LA0011/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/42021/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of phenolic compounds from Eucalyptus globulus bark was carried out along with detailed analysis of the extracts for the first time. The extracts were accessed in terms of: (i) extraction yield (EY), (ii) total phenolic content by Folin-Ciocalteu method (TPC), (iii) phenolics quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (PC-HPLC), and (iv) antioxidant activity (AA). Preliminary runs were performed with pure and modified CO2, using ethanol (EtOH), ethyl acetate, and water. The CO2/EtOH mixture provided the best extraction yield, high total phenolic content and antioxidant activity. Results also demonstrated high selectivity of the CO2/EtOH mixture to the extraction of flavanones, particularly eriodictyol and naringenin; and to the O-methylated flavonol isorhamentin, also found in abundance. To analyse the influence of temperature, ethanol content and flow rate on SFE at 300 bar using CO2/EtOH, a full 2(3) design of experiments was accomplished. The most favourable conditions under the experimental range studied were found as 70 degrees C, 20% ethanol, and 10 g of CO2 min(-1), for which EY = 0.48%, TPC = 57.22 mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)g(-1) of extract, PC-HPLC = 119.46 mg g(-1) of extract, and AA = 49.74 mg of ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE)g(-1) of extract. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据