4.5 Article

Impregnation of flax oil in pregelatinized corn starch using supercritical CO2

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 221-228

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2011.08.013

关键词

Flax oil; Impregnation; Nutraceutical delivery; Oleic acid; Pregelatinized corn starch; Supercritical CO2

资金

  1. Alberta Agricultural Research Institute (AARI)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer impregnation of active components using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) has been studied for pharmaceutical and material processing applications, but only to a limited extent for food systems. SC-CO2 has the ability to diffuse into the amorphous or glassy regions of polymers, resulting in polymer swelling. This study was carried out to evaluate the behavior of pregelatinized corn starch (PGS) in SC-CO2 and to determine its potential impregnation with oleic acid and flax oil in SC-CO2 media. Starch was mixed with either oleic acid or flax oil and held in SC-CO2 at 15 or 30 MPa and 40, 60 or 80 degrees C under static or dynamic conditions. The resulting particles were analyzed to determine impregnation efficiency. Scanning electron micrographs confirmed the effectiveness of the washing treatment employed to remove surface oil. The SC-CO2 treatment did not affect PGS particle size. Higher impregnation efficiencies were obtained with oleic acid compared to those obtained with flax oil. For oleic acid, the highest efficiency was found at 40 C and 15 MPa (11.4% w/w) under static conditions, while for flax oil, only 6.6% (w/w) impregnation efficiency was achieved at 30 MPa and 80 degrees C and there were no significant differences among treatments. Both solubility and diffusion of oleic acid or flax oil in SC-CO2 play an important role in the impregnation process. Findings indicate that SC-CO2 technology has potential for food-grade polymer impregnation targeting nutraceutical delivery. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据