4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Polymer composite biomaterials from polyethylene/poly(vinyl acetate) prepared in supercritical carbon dioxide and their bulk and surface characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 391-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2007.09.020

关键词

polyethylene/poly(vinyl acetate) composite; supercritical carbon dioxide; bulk and surface modification; phosphorylcholine group; biomaterials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A polymer composite comprised of polyethylene (PE) and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) with a biocompatible surface was developed for use in medical devices by the use of the following two-step processes: (i) the first step was to prepare polymer composite using supercritical carbon dioxide (ScCO2) methods and (ii) the second step was to introduce phosphorylcholine groups onto the surface of polymer composite by Surface reaction. This article especially reports a detailed study of the syntheses, and mechanical properties and the microstructure of obtained polymer composite by ScCO2 methods. The formation mechanism of PE/PVAc composites was that supercritical impregnation of a monomer and initiator into polymer substrate followed by in situ polymerization within the polymer matrix. Differential scanning calorimetry, wide-angle and small-angle X-ray scattering measurement showed that PE and PVAc were blended at the nanometer level. PVAc generated in the amorphous regions at nanometer level did not affect the crystalline of PE. This microstructure affected mechanical properties Such as dynamic viscoelasticity, Young's modulus, fracture stress and strain of the PE/PVAc composite. These properties depended on the composition of the composite that can be controlled with polymerization time. The synthesis method of polymer composite Using ScCO2 can be applied to create polymer biomaterials with suitable mechanical properties for the Soft tissue, hard tissue, and organs. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据