4.5 Article

Preferred orientation of phyllosilicates: Comparison of fault gouge, shale and schist

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 478-489

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2010.02.003

关键词

Phyllosilicate fabrics; Fault gouge; Shale; Schist

资金

  1. DOE-BES [DE-FG02-05ER15637]
  2. NSF [EAR-0836402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Samples of fault gouge from the San Andreas Fault drill hole (SAFOD), a shale from the North Sea sedimentary basin and schists from metamorphic rocks in the Alps have been analyzed with high energy synchrotron X-rays to determine preferred orientation of mica and clay minerals. The method relies on obtaining 20 diffraction images which are then processed with the crystallographic Rietveld method, implemented in the software MAUD, allowing for deconvolution of phases and extraction of their orientation distributions It is possible to distinguish between detrital like/muscovite and authigenic illite/smectite, kaolinite and chlorite, and muscovite and biotite, with strongly overlapping peaks in the diffraction pattern The results demonstrate that phyllosilicates show large texture variations in various environments, where different mechanisms produce the rock microfabrics. fault gouge fabrics are quite weak and asymmetric with maxima for (001) in the range of 15-25 multiples of random distribution (m.rd.). This is attributed to heterogeneous deformation with randomization, as well as dissolution precipitation reactions. Shale fabrics have maxima ranging from 3 to 9 m.r.d and this is due to sedimentation and compaction. The strongest fabrics were observed in metamorphic schists (10-14 m.r.d) and developed by deformation as well as recrystallization in a stress field. In the analyzed samples, fabrics of co-existing quartz are weak. All phyllosilicate textures can be explained by orientation of (001) platelets, with no additional constraints on a-axes (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据