4.5 Article

Grain size distribution and microstructures of experimentally sheared granitoid gouge at coseismic slip rates - Criteria to distinguish seismic and aseismic faults?

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 59-69

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2009.08.002

关键词

Cataclasite; Rock deformation; Microstructures; Seismic deformation; Grain size

资金

  1. Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft
  2. Zentrum of Microscopy of Basel University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microstructures and grain size distribution from high velocity friction experiments are compared with those of slow deformation experiments of Keulen et al. (2007, 2008) for the same material (Verzasca granitoid). The mechanical behavior of granitoid gouge in fast velocity friction experiments at slip rates of 0.65 and 1.28 m/s and normal stresses of 0.4-0.9 MPa is characterized by slip weakening in a typical exponential friction coefficient vs displacement relationship. The grain size distributions yield similar D-values (slope of frequency versus grain size curve = 2.2-2.3) as those of slow deformation experiments (D = 2.0-2.3) for grain sizes larger than 1 mu m. These values are independent of the total displacement above a shear strain of about gamma = 20. The D-values are also independent of the displacement rates in the range of similar to 1 mu m/s to similar to 1.3 m/s and do not vary in the normal stress range between 0.5 MPa and 500 MPa. With increasing displacement, grain shapes evolve towards more rounded and less serrated grains. While the grain size distribution remains constant, the progressive grain shape evolution suggests that grain comminution takes place by attrition at clast boundaries. Attrition produces a range of very small grain sizes by crushing with a D-<-value = 1. The results of the study demonstrate that most cataclastic and gouge fault zones may have resulted from seismic deformation but the distinction of seismic and aseismic deformation cannot be made on the basis of grain size distribution. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据