4.5 Article

Disentangling magnetic subfabrics and their link to deformation processes in cleaved sedimentary rocks from the Internal Sierras (west central Pyrenees, Spain)

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 163-176

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2008.11.002

关键词

Magnetic fabric; Magnetic subfabrics; Layer-parallel shortening; Cleavage; Pyrenees; Remagnetization

资金

  1. (MEC, Spain) [BTE 2002-04168, CGL2006-2289-BTE, CGL2006-02514-BTE]
  2. European Council [CTPR04/2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we present a detailed study of the magnetic fabrics and subfabrics of remagnetized Upper Cretaceous limolites that crop out in the Internal Sierras (west central Pyrenees) affected by a penetrative pressure-solution cleavage. The bulk magnetic fabrics of these rocks (RT-AMS) show variable orientations that do not conform to what is typically reported for cleaved sedimentary rocks. In contrast, the paramagnetic subfabrics (LT-AMS) show remarkably constant directional properties, so that their K-max and K-min axes cluster parallel to the intersection lineation and to the poles to bedding, respectively. These LT-AMS subfabrics indicate a preferred orientation of phyllosillicates that is consistent with a syn-sedimentary (Late Cretaceous) period of NNE-oriented layer-parallel shortening. Noticeably, these phyllosillicate subfabrics are not further altered by the subsequent formation of cleavage in the Late Eocene-Early Oligocene. The ferrimagnetic subfabrics (AARM) also show remarkably constant orientation, so that their K-max axes are strikingly parallel to the shortening direction in the area. We interpret this preferred orientation of ferrimagnetic grains as being caused by subhorizontal shear associated to cleavage formation, which is consistent with the age and mechanisms (authigenic growth and rotation of pre-existing magnetite grains) proposed for the pervasive remagnetization that affects the studied rocks. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据