4.7 Article

An endoplasmic reticulum magnesium transporter is essential for pollen development in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 212-220

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.12.008

关键词

Endoplasmic reticulum; Magnesium transporter; Pollen abortion

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [NSFC-31170229, 31371244]
  2. Key Project of Hunan Provincial Education Department [12A096]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation [12JJ6021]
  4. Hunan Provincial Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Ecology [0713]
  5. Hunan Provincial Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering and New Products for Developmental Biology [20134486]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium is one of the essential macro-elements for plant growth and development, participated in photosynthesis and various metabolic processes. The Mg-transport abilities of the AtMGT (Magnesium Transporter) genes were identified in bacteria or yeast mutant system. In our previous studies, both the AtMGT5 and AtMGT9 were found essential for pollen development in Arabidopsis. Here we report another AtMGT member, AtMGT4, which was localized to the endoplasmic reticulum, was essential for pollen development as well. AtMGT4 expressed notably in pollen grains from bicellular pollen stage to mature pollen stage. A T-DNA insertional mutant of the gene, named mgt4-1, showed pollen abortive phenotype, thus we could not get any homozygous mutant from progenies of self-crossed +/mgt4-1 plants. Meanwhile, nearly half of pollens in AtMGT4-RNAi transgenic lines were sterile, consistent with the phenotype of +/mgt4-1 mutant. Transgenic plants expressing AtMGT4 in the mgt4-1 background could recover the pollen fertility to the wild type. Together, our findings demonstrated that the disruption of AtMGT4 in Arabidopsis could cause a defect of pollen development. The visible pollen abortion appeared at bicellular pollen stage in +/mgt4-1. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据