4.4 Article

Hydrogen-bond network and pH sensitivity in transthyretin: Neutron crystal structure of human transthyretin

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 177, 期 2, 页码 283-290

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.022

关键词

Neutron protein crystallography; Transthyretin; Protonation state; Hydrogen-bond network; Amyloidosis; Structure stability

资金

  1. Ibaraki prefectural government
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  3. [21770159]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21750007, 21770159, 21113003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transthyretin (TTR) is a tetrameric protein associated with human amyloidosis. In vitro, the formation of amyloid fibrils by TTR is known to be promoted by low pH. Here we show the neutron structure of TTR, focusing on the hydrogen bonds, protonation states and pH sensitivities. A large crystal was prepared at pD 7.4 for neutron protein crystallography. Neutron diffraction studies were conducted using the IBA-RAKI Biological Crystal Diffractometer with the time-of-flight method. The neutron structure solved at 2.0 angstrom resolution revealed the protonation states of His88 and the detailed hydrogen-bond network depending on the protonation states of His88. This hydrogen-bond network is composed of Thr75, Trp79, His88, Ser112, Pro113, Thr118-B and four water molecules, and is involved in both monomer-monomer and dimer-dimer interactions, suggesting that the double protonation of His88 by acidification breaks the hydrogen-bond network and causes the destabilization of the TTR tetramer. In addition, the comparison with X-ray structure at pH 4.0 indicated that the protonation occurred to Asp74, His88 and Glu89 at pH 4.0. Our neutron model provides insights into the molecular stability of TTR related to the hydrogen-bond network, the pH sensitivity and the CH center dot center dot center dot O weak hydrogen bond. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据