4.2 Article

The Effect of Acute Medication with Cilostazol, an Anti-platelet Drug, on the Outcome of Small Vessel Brain Infarction

期刊

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1409-1415

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.023

关键词

Antiplatelet medication; acute brain infarction; small vessel occlusion; progressing stroke; outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our objective was to investigate the effect of cilostazol in acute therapy for small vessel stroke patients. The neurologic deficits in some patients of small vessel brain infarction will progress even if a patient takes immediate medical treatments including aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs. In Japan, cilostazol, presenting not only the antiplatelet effect but also the arteriole dilation, is used for treatment of ischemic stroke. In this study, acute stroke patients with small vessel occlusion were treated with cilostazol instead of aspirin in the conventional medication after 2010. Therefore, patients between April 2007 and March 2009 were classified into the conventional group (group-con,n = 220), and patients between April 2010 and March 2012 were classified into the cilostazol group (group-cilo, n = 230). Enrolled patients were classified into lacunar infarction (LI) and branch atheromatous disease. Progressing stroke was defined as the increase of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 2 or more within 48 hours. The clinical outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 1 month. As the result, the significant reduction in progressing stroke was dominant in the LI of brainstem (P = .01). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the group-cilo compared with the group-con (18.6 and 21.2 days, P = .03). Moreover, mRS score at 1 month was significantly lower in the group-cilo than the group-con (1.9 and 2.3, P = .03). In conclusion, cilostazol reduced the risk of early neurologic deterioration of patients with small vessel brain infarction. It is eagerly desired to conduct a large randomized control trial. (C) 2014 by National Stroke Association

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据