4.2 Article

Gastroesophageal Reflux during Enteral Feeding in Stroke Patients: A 24-hour Esophageal pH-monitoring Study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.07.008

关键词

Enteral feeding; gastroesophageal reflux; pH monitoring; poststroke pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients who are unable to eat or drink after stroke may receive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or nasogastric tube feeding. Although the most common serious complication is well known to be aspiration pneumonia, the role of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) has not been fully assessed. The aim of this study was to examine, by means of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, whether GER is related to aspiration pneumonia and whether the size and laterality of brain lesions influence GER. Methods: Sixteen stroke patients were examined using a Degitrapper pH400 (Medtronic Japan Co., Tokyo, Japan) and Zinetics 24ME multiuse pH catheter (Medtronic). All patients had stroke lesions in the territory of the left or right middle cerebral artery that were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were receiving PEG or nasogastric feeding. Stroke volume was measured with MRIcron software. Results: Nine patients (56%) were diagnosed with GER, and 10 (63%) developed aspiration pneumonia after enteral feeding. The rate of aspiration pneumonia was significantly higher in patients with GER (88.9%) than in those without GER (42.9%; P = .04). Patients with left hemispheric lesions had a significantly higher incidence of acid reflex than those with right lesions (116 +/- 105 vs 13 +/- 17; P = .04). There were no significant differences in total time of acid reflux or mean pH value between patients with left and right hemispheric lesions. The lesion volume had no significant effect on any of 3 indices of GER. Conclusions: GER is associated with aspiration pneumonia and occurs more often in patients with stroke lesions in the left hemisphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据