4.4 Article

ADDITION OF SYNCHRONOUS WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION TO BODY MASS RESISTIVE EXERCISE CAUSES LITTLE OR NO EFFECTS ON MUSCLE DAMAGE AND INFLAMMATION

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318296484f

关键词

muscle soreness; muscle function; IL-6; IL-10; IL-beta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hazell, TJ, Olver, TD, Hamilton, CD, and Lemon, PWR. Addition of synchronous whole-body vibration to body mass resistive exercise causes little or no effects on muscle damage and inflammation. J Strength Cond Res 28(1): 53-60, 2014-The purpose of this study was to determine if a moderate intensity whole-body vibration (WBV) body mass resistive exercise session causes additional muscle damage, soreness, and inflammation compared with the same exercise session without vibration (NoV). Ten recreationally active male university students completed 2 separate 24-hour study periods incorporating an exercise session with WBV or NoV. Muscle torque was measured (at 0, 60, and 240 degrees s(-1) angular velocities), soreness (10-point scale) in the upper (UE [triceps]) and lower (LE [quadriceps]) extremities, and muscle inflammation markers (interleukin [IL]-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10) were measured at 4 time points (preexercise, immediately postexercise, 4 hours post, and 24 hours post). Diet was controlled. Compared with NoV, WBV increased (p < 0.01) muscle soreness at 24 hours postexercise in both the UE (2.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.9) and LE (2.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 0.7 +/- 0.7). Muscle torque was decreased immediately postexercise (p < 0.05) in the UE and LE at 0 degrees.s(-1) and in the UE at 240 degrees s(-1), but there was no difference between exercise treatments. The exercise session caused significant but small increases in IL-1 beta and IL-6 but with no differences between exercise treatments. Interleukin-10 was increased with WBV (2.9 +/- 2.0 to 3.6 +/- 1.9 pg.ml(-1); p < 0.03). These data suggest that the addition of WBV to exercise has little effect on muscle function and damage, soreness, or inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据