4.4 Article

Effects of Body Position and Loading Modality on Muscle Activity and Strength in Shoulder Presses

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 1824-1831

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318276b873

关键词

EMG; resistance exercise; instability; free weights; 1-RM; shoulder press

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Saeterbakken, AH and Fimland, MS. Effects of body position and loading modality on muscle activity and strength in shoulder presses. J Strength Cond Res 27(7): 1824-1831, 2013Little is known about the effect of performing upper-body resistance exercises with dumbbells versus barbells and standing versus seated. Therefore, this study sought to compare electromyogram activity (EMG) and one-repetition maximum (1-RM) in barbell and dumbbell shoulder presses performed seated and standing. Fifteen healthy men volunteered for 1-RM and EMG testing with a load corresponding to 80% of the 1-RM. Electromyogram activity was measured in the anterior, medial, and posterior deltoids and biceps and triceps brachii. The following EMG differences or trends were observed: For deltoid anterior: approximate to 11% lower for seated barbell versus dumbbell (p = 0.038), approximate to 15% lower in standing barbell versus dumbbell (p < 0.001), approximate to 8% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p = 0.070); For medial deltoid, approximate to 7% lower for standing barbell versus dumbbells (p = 0.050), approximate to 7% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p = 0.062), 15% lower for seated versus standing dumbbell (p = 0.008); For posterior deltoid: approximate to 25% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p < 0.001), approximate to 24% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p = 0.002); For biceps, approximate to 33% greater for seated barbell versus dumbbells (p = 0.002), 16% greater for standing barbell versus dumbbell (p = 0.074), approximate to 23% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p < 0.001); For triceps, approximate to 39% greater for standing barbell versus dumbbells (p < 0.001), approximate to 20% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p = 0.094). 1-RM strength for standing dumbbells was approximate to 7% lower than standing barbell (p = 0.002) and approximate to 10% lower than seated dumbbells (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the exercise with the greatest stability requirement (standing and dumbbells) demonstrated the highest neuromuscular activity of the deltoid muscles, although this was the exercise with the lowest 1-RM strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据