4.4 Article

THE EFFECT OF COMBINED EXERCISE TRAINING IN ADOLESCENTS WHO ARE OVERWEIGHT OR OBESE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: THE ROLE OF TRAINING FREQUENCY

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 2274-2282

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f11c41

关键词

mental retardation; aerobic capacity; muscle strength; training mode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elmahgoub, SS, Calders, P, Lambers, S, Stegen, SM, Van Laethem, C, and Cambier, DC. The effect of combined exercise training in Adolescents Who Are Overweight or Obese with intellectual disability: the role of training frequency. J Strength Cond Res 25(8): 2274-2282, 2011-Data about effects of exercise training in adolescents with intellectual disability (ID) are very limited. This study investigated the effect of 2 different frequencies of the same intensity and total training volume of combined exercise training on indices of body composition, physical fitness, and lipid profile in overweight and obese adolescents with ID. A total of 45 overweight and obese adolescents with ID aged 14-22 years with a total IQ 45-70 received combined exercise training 3 times a week (CET3) for 30 sessions (10 weeks; n = 15), twice a week (CET2) for 30 sessions (15 weeks; n = 15), or no training (10 weeks; n = 15). Groups were matched for age, sex, and education form. Before and after the intervention period, indices of body composition, physical fitness and lipid profile have been evaluated. Compared to the control group, CET3 resulted in a significant improvement of physical fitness, obesity indices, and lipid profile of the participants. Comparing CET2 with CET3, no significantly different evolutions were noticed, except for lower limb strength in favor of exercising 3 times a week. In conclusion, exercising 2 times a week, which is more feasible and practical for participants and guidance, has the same health beneficial effects as 3 times per week in overweight and obese adolescents with ID in short-term training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据