4.4 Article

RELIABILITY OF THE REACTIVE STRENGTH INDEX AND TIME TO STABILIZATION DURING DEPTH JUMPS

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 1677-1682

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318182034b

关键词

plyometrics; balance; stretch shortening cycle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flanagan, EP, Ebben, WP, and Jensen, RL. Reliability of the reactive strength index and time to stabilization during depth jumps. J Strength Cond Res 22(5): 1677-1682, 2008-The reliability of the reactive strength index (RSI) and time to stabilization (TTS) during maximal-effort plyometric depth jumps was examined. Twenty-two subjects performed three depth jumps from a height of 30 cm. Measures such as height of jump (JH), ground-contact time (CT), RSI, and TTS were obtained and analyzed for reliability using Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient and intraclass correlations. The JH, CT, and RSI were shown to be highly reliable from trial to trial (evidenced by high Cronbach reliability coefficients (alpha > 0.95) and high single-and average-measures intraclass correlations (>0.9). Time to stabilization was not reliable from trial to trial, as evidenced by a low Cronbach reliability coefficient (alpha < 0.7) and poor single (<0.5) and average-measures (<0.7) intraclass correlations. The RSI was observed to be consistent for single measures, suggesting that coaches dealing with large numbers of athletes can conduct only a single trial from each depth jump height when attempting to optimize plyometric depth jump heights for their athletes. Time to stabilization could be a useful tool for strength and conditioning investigators to quantify the landing portion of plyometric exercises, but the protocol used in the current study to measure this variable did not prove to be reliable. Investigators wishing to use this measurement in such a context in future research studies may need to allow subjects appropriate habituation periods and control for arm movement during the landing phase of the exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据