4.5 Article

Mechanisms and resistance in glucocorticoid control of inflammation

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.02.018

关键词

COPD; Asthma; p38 MAP kinase; Histone deacetylase; Steroid resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoids are the most effective anti-inflammatory therapy for many chronic inflammatory and immune diseases, such as asthma, but are relatively ineffective in other diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Glucocorticoids suppress inflammation by several mechanisms. Glucocorticoids suppress the multiple inflammatory genes that are activated in chronic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma, by reversing histone acetylation of activated inflammatory genes through binding of liganded glucocorticoid receptors (GR) to coactivator molecules and recruitment of histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) to the activated transcription complex. At higher concentrations of glucocorticoids GR homodimers interact with DNA recognition sites to activate transcription through increased histone acetylation of anti-inflammatory genes and transcription of several genes linked to glucocorticoid side effects. Decreased glucocorticoid responsiveness is found in patients with severe asthma and asthmatics who smoke, as well as in all patients with COPD and cystic fibrosis. Several molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance have now been identified. HDAC2 is markedly reduced in activity and expression as a result of oxidative/nitrative stress so that inflammation becomes resistant to the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids. Dissociated glucocorticoids have been developed to reduce side effects but so far it has been difficult to dissociate anti-inflammatory effects from adverse effects. In patients with glucocorticoid resistance alternative anti-inflammatory treatments are being investigated as well as drugs that may reverse the molecular mechanism of glucocorticoid resistance. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据