4.5 Article

Novel, orally active selective progesterone receptor modulator CP8947 inhibits leiomyoma cell proliferation without adversely affecting endometrium or myometrium

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.05.005

关键词

Selective progesterone receptor modulator; Apoptosis; Endometrium; Leiomyoma; Myometrium; Extracellular matrix

资金

  1. Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  2. PRAE, NICHD, NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uterine leiomyomas are highly prevalent and often symptomatic, but current medical therapies are limited. A novel, potent, selective, orally active therapy is needed. The goal of these studies was to determine the progesterone receptor (PR) specificity and activation, endometrial response, and impact on leiomyoma cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production of the novel non-steroidal selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) CP8863 and CP8947. In vitro progestational activity was assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay and ER-a expression. In vivo progestational activity was assayed by the McPhail assay. Proliferation and gene expression studies were performed in immortalized human leiomyoma and myometrial cells. Both CP8863 and CP8947 were highly selective for progesterone receptor (PR) but not for ER-alpha, AR, and GR. Both compounds induced alkaline phosphatase comparably to progesterone, while CP8947 induced ER-alpha in leiomyoma cells but not myometrial cells. CP8947 was progestational in rabbit endometrium Nanomolar CP8947 treatment inhibited human leiomyoma but not myometrial cell proliferation. Extracellular matrix components were decreased in leiomyoma cells, including COL1A1 and COL7A1 at nanomolar concentrations. CP8947 was a potent novel non-steroidal SPRM that was selective for PR, demonstrated progestational activity in enclometrium, inhibited leiomyoma cell proliferation and decreased ECM component production, without disrupting myometrial cell proliferation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据