4.4 Article

Region Graph Partition Function Expansion and Approximate Free Energy Landscapes: Theory and Some Numerical Results

期刊

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS
卷 148, 期 3, 页码 513-547

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-012-0555-1

关键词

Region graph; Belief propagation; Bethe-Peierls free energy; Edwards-Anderson spin glass; Partition function expansion; Graphical model

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-EW-J02]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [10834014, 11121403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphical models for finite-dimensional spin glasses and real-world combinatorial optimization and satisfaction problems usually have an abundant number of short loops. The cluster variation method and its extension, the region graph method, are theoretical approaches for treating the complicated short-loop-induced local correlations. For graphical models represented by non-redundant or redundant region graphs, approximate free energy landscapes are constructed in this paper through the mathematical framework of region graph partition function expansion. Several free energy functionals are obtained, each of which use a set of probability distribution functions or functionals as order parameters. These probability distribution function/functionals are required to satisfy the region graph belief-propagation equation or the region graph survey-propagation equation to ensure vanishing correction contributions of region subgraphs with dangling edges. As a simple application of the general theory, we perform region graph belief-propagation simulations on the square-lattice ferromagnetic Ising model and the Edwards-Anderson model. Considerable improvements over the conventional Bethe-Peierls approximation are achieved. Collective domains of different sizes in the disordered and frustrated square lattice are identified by the message-passing procedure. Such collective domains and the frustrations among them are responsible for the low-temperature glass-like dynamical behaviors of the system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据