4.6 Article

Random, thermodynamic and inverse first-order transitions in the Blume-Capel spin glass

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/12/P12005

关键词

solvable lattice models; phase diagrams (theory); cavity and replica method; spin glasses (theory)

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research [RBFR08M3P4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A class of model systems undergoing a glass transition with inversion of the fluid and glassy phase in temperature is investigated in order to qualitatively characterize the so-called inverse freezing phenomenon occurring in some complex glassy polymeric systems such as methylcellulose. The leading model we analyze is the spherical mean-field approximation of a spin-1 model with p-body quenched disordered interaction. Depending on temperature and chemical potential the system is found in a paramagnetic or in a glassy phase and the transition between these phases can be of a different nature. In the given conditions inverse freezing occurs. As p = 2 the glassy phase is replica-symmetric and the transition is always continuous in the phase diagram. For p > 2 the exact solution for the glassy phase is obtained by the one-step replica symmetry breaking ansatz. Different scenarios arise for both the dynamic and the thermodynamic transitions. These include (i) the usual random first-order transition (Kauzmann-like) preceded by a dynamic transition, typical of mean-field glasses, (ii) a thermodynamic first-order transition with phase coexistence and latent heat and (iii) a regime of inversion of static and dynamic transition lines. In the latter case a thermodynamic stable glassy phase, with zero configurational entropy, is dynamically accessible from the paramagnetic phase. Crossover between different transition regimes is analyzed by means of replica symmetry breaking theory and a detailed study of the complexity and of the stability of the static solution is performed throughout the space of external thermodynamic parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据