4.6 Article

Velocity and acceleration before contact in the tackle during rugby union matches

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1215-1224

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.707328

关键词

Tackle; rugby union; performance analysis; velocity; acceleration

资金

  1. National Research Foundation/German Academic Exchange Service
  2. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  3. Frank Foreman Scholarship
  4. Glickman/Elliot Scholarship
  5. University of Cape Town Equity Scholarship
  6. Doctoral Research Scholarship
  7. Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The velocity and acceleration at which the ball-carrier or tackler enters the tackle may contribute to winning the contest and prevailing injury free. Velocity and acceleration have been quantified in controlled settings, whereas in match-play it has been subjectively described. The purpose of this study was to determine the velocity and acceleration of the ball-carrier and tackler before contact during match-play in three competitions (Super 14, Varsity Cup, and Under-19 Currie Cup). Using a two-dimensional scaled version of the field, the velocity and acceleration of the ball-carrier and tackler were measured at every 0.1 s to contact for 0.5 s. For front-on tackles, a significant difference (P<0.05) between the ball-carrier (4.6 +/- 1 m.s(-1)) and tackler (7.1 +/- 3.5 m.s(-1)) was found at the 0.5 s time to contact interval in the Varsity Cup. For side-on tackles, differences between the two opposing players were found at 0.5 s (ball-carrier: 4.6 +/- 1.7 m.s(-1); tackler: 3.1 +/- 1.2 m.s(-1)) and 0.4 s (ball-carrier: 6.3 +/- 2.3 m.s(-1); tackler: 3.7 +/- 1.6 m.s(-1)) at Under-19 level. After 0.4 s, no significant differences (P>0.05) were evident. Also, the ball-carrier's velocity over the 0.5 s was relatively stable compared with that of the tackler. Results suggest that tacklers adjust their velocity to reach a suitable relative velocity before making contact with the ball-carrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据