4.6 Article

A combined insulin reduction and carbohydrate feeding strategy 30min before running best preserves blood glucose concentration after exercise through improved fuel oxidation in type 1 diabetes mellitus

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 279-289

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.531753

关键词

Type 1 diabetes; low glycaemic index; hypoglycaemia

资金

  1. Welsh Office of Research and Development (WORD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we examined the glycaemic and fuel oxidation responses to alterations in the timing of a low glycaemic index carbohydrate and 75% reduced insulin dose, prior to running, in type 1 diabetes individuals. After carbohydrate (75g isomaltulose) and insulin administration, the seven participants rested for 30min, 60min, 90min or 120min (conditions 30MIN, 60MIN, 90MIN, and 120MIN, respectively) before completing 45min of running at 70% peak oxygen uptake. Carbohydrate and lipid oxidation rates were monitored during exercise and blood glucose and insulin were measured before and for 3h after exercise. Data were analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Pre-exercise blood glucose concentrations were lower for 30MIN compared with 120MIN (P0.05), but insulin concentrations were similar. Exercising carbohydrate and lipid oxidation rates were lower and greater, respectively, for 30MIN compared with 120MIN (P0.05). The drop in blood glucose during exercise was less for 30MIN (3.7 mmol center dot l-1, s[xbar]=0.4) compared with 120MIN (6.4 mmol center dot l-1, s[xbar]=0.3) (P=0.02). For 60min post-exercise, blood glucose concentrations were higher for 30MIN compared with 120MIN (P0.05). There were no cases of hypoglycaemia in the 30MIN condition, one case in the 60MIN condition, two in the 90MIN condition, and five in the 120MIN condition. In conclusion, a low glycaemic index carbohydrate and reduced insulin dose administered 30min before running improves pre- and post-exercise blood glucose responses in type 1 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据