4.6 Article

Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) ameliorates waterlogging-induced damage in cotton by inhibiting ethylene synthesis and sustaining photosynthetic capacity

期刊

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
卷 76, 期 1, 页码 83-98

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-015-0037-y

关键词

Ethylene; Fruit shedding; Leaf wilting; Nutrient acquisition; Photosynthesis; Waterlogging

资金

  1. Cruiser RD fund
  2. Syngenta Crop Protection Australia and Cotton Seed Distributors
  3. Cotton Research and Development Corporation
  4. University of Sydney, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this glasshouse study, we investigated the mechanisms of aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG)-induced waterlogging tolerance in cotton. Two cotton cultivars Sicot 71BRF (moderately waterlogging tolerant) and LA 887 (waterlogging sensitive) were grown in a clay-loam soil, and exposed to waterlogging at early squaring stage (53 days after sowing). One day prior to waterlogging, shoots were sprayed with AVG (ReTain(A (R)), 830 ppm). Continuous waterlogging for 2 weeks accelerated the shedding of leaves and fruits. As the duration of waterlogging increased, shoot growth rate, biomass accumulation, photosynthesis (P (n)) and stomatal conductance (g (s)) were all reduced. Growth of LA 887 was more severely impaired than Sicot 71BRF, with a decline in leaf P (n) and g (s) after just 4 h of waterlogging. Waterlogging inhibited allocation of nitrogen (N) to the youngest fully expanded leaves, photosynthesis and biomass accumulation, while it accelerated ethylene production promoting leaf and fruit abscission. AVG blocked ethylene accumulation in leaves and subsequently improved leaf growth, N acquisition and photosynthetic parameters. In addition, AVG enhanced fruit production of both cotton cultivars under waterlogged and non-waterlogged conditions. Higher ethylene production in cotton is linked with fruit abscission, implying that AVG-induced ethylene inhibition could potentially limit yield losses in waterlogged cotton.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据