4.0 Article

Flexion Model Simulating Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormality in Patients With Ossification of the Longitudinal Ligament: The Influence of Flexion Speed on the Cervical Spine

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 555-559

出版社

AMER PARAPLEGIA SOC
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2009.11754557

关键词

Spinal cord injuries; Cervical spine; Myelopathy; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Finite element method; Biomechanics; SCIWORA (Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormality)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objective: It is suspected that the speed of the motion of the spinal cord under static compression may be the cause of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, little is known about the relationship between the speed of the motion of the spinal cord and its stress distributions. The objective was to carry out a biomechanical study of SCI in patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament without radiologic evidence of injury. Methods: A 3-dimensional finite element spinal cord model was established. After the application of static compression, the model underwent anterior flexion to simulate SCI in ossification of the longitudinal ligament patients without radiologic abnormality. Flexion of the spine was assumed to occur at I motor segment. Flexion angle was 5 degrees, and flexion speeds were 0.5 degrees/s, 5 degrees/s, and 50 degrees/s. Stress distributions inside of the spinal cord were evaluated. Results: Stresses on the spinal cord increased slightly after the application of 5 degrees of flexion at a speed of 0.5 degrees/s. Stresses became much higher at a speed of 5 degrees/s and increased further at 50 degrees s. Conclusions: The stress distribution of the spinal cord under static compression increased with faster flexion speed of the spinal cord. High-speed motion of the spinal cord under static compression may be one of the causes of SCI in the absence of radiologic abnormality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据