4.1 Article

Electron microprobe U-Th-Pb monazite dating of the Transamazonian metamorphic overprint on Archean rocks from the Amapa Block, southeastern Guiana Shield, Northern Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 445-462

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2008.05.007

关键词

Transamazonian orogenesis; Electron microprobe; U-Th-Pb dating; Monazite; Amazonian craton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Amapa Block, southeastern Guiana Shield, represents an Archean block involved in a large Paleoproterozoic belt, with evolution related to the Transamazonian orogenic cycle (2.26 to 1.95 Ga). High spatial resolution dating using an electron-probe microanalyzer (EPMA) was employed to obtain U-Th-Pb chemical ages in monazite of seven rock samples of the Archean basement from that tectonic block, which underwent granulite- and amphibolite-facies metamorphism. Pb-Pb zircon dating was also performed on one sample. Monazite and zircon ages demonstrate that the metamorphic overprinting of the Archean basement occurred during the Transamazonian orogenesis, and two main tectono-thermal events were recorded. The first one is revealed by monazite ages of 2096 +/- 6, 2093 +/- 8, 2088 +/- 8, 2087 +/- 3 and 2086 +/- 8 Ma, and by the zircon age of 2091 +/- 5 Ma, obtained in granulitic rocks. These concordant ages provided a reliable estimate of the time of the granulite-facies metamorphism in the southwest of the Amapa Block and, coupled with petro-structural data, suggest that it was contemporaneous to the development of a thrusting system associated to the collisional stage of the Transamazonian orogenesis, at about 2.10-2.08 Ga. The later event, under amphibolite-facies conditions, is recorded by monazite ages of 2056 +/- 7 and 2038 +/- 6 Ma, and is consistent with a post-collisional stage, marked by granite emplacement and coeval migmatization of the Archean basement along strike-slip shear zones. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据