4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

pH-Dependent Antibiotic Gatifloxacin Interacting with Cationic Surfactant: Insights from Spectroscopic and Chromatographic Measurements

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLUTION CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 936-948

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10953-018-0811-3

关键词

Microheterogeneous; Pseudo-models; Quaternary ammonium surfactant; Molecular electrostatic potential; Palisade layer

资金

  1. Pakistan Higher Education Commission [NRPU 4557]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microheterogeneous surfactant assemblies solubilize and encapsulate active drug molecules and consequently protect them from the adverse environmental conditions. As pseudo-models of biological membranes the associated structures of surfactant molecule are also very handy for investigators to discern their roles in cellular interactions. The present study reveals the molecular interaction of a potential antibiotic, Gatifloxacin (GTF), with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, a quaternary ammonium surfactant) at physiological pH. Chromatographic and spectral-luminescent measurements were performed to probe the GTF-CTAB association and drug-surfactant interaction modes which were quantified by estimating the binding capacities (K-b) and related Gibbs energies at various pH values. The binding values of GTF-CTAB obtained from micellar liquid chromatography measurements are found to be in good agreement with those measured by electronic spectroscopy. Moreover, the data obtained from molecular electrostatic potentials revealed that the slightly basic medium (pH = 7.4) induces hydrophilic character in GTF molecules that may dynamically assist the incorporation of drug molecules into the outer core in the palisade layer of CTAB micelles, which favors penetration binding. In addition to electrostatic intermolecular forces, the hydrophobic aggregates of surfactant molecules are also found to aid solubilization of GTF in the aggregate's corona, which may result in controlled release of the drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据