4.1 Article

Thermodynamic Characteristics and Spectral-Luminescent Properties of N-m-Tolylbenzamide in Microheterogeneous Surfactant Self-Assemblies

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLUTION CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 632-647

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10953-014-0151-x

关键词

N-m-Tolylbenzamide; Ionic surfactants; Partition coefficient; Fluorescence emission spectra; Penetration binding

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To model the binding to biomembranes, the interactions of potent N-m-tolylbenzamide (NTB) with a cationic surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and an anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), have been investigated. The study was carried out by quantifying the absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of NTB as a function of pre-micellar to post-micellar surfactant concentrations in the temperature range of 25-50 A degrees C. NTB is a strongly fluorescent compound that exhibits intense violet fluorescence. Using mathematical models, the water-micelle partition coefficient (K (x)), surfactant-NTB binding constant (K (b)), binding capacity (n (b)) and the degree of counter-ion binding (alpha) are discussed from the thermodynamic viewpoint, considering the thermodynamic parameters of additive solubilization (). The high values of all interactions, especially when the surface charge of the organized medium is cationic, ensure that there are greater interactions between the NTB and CTAB than with SDS. The NTB molecule is found to be located at only one binding site of each surfactant and probably exhibits static quenching rather than a collisional quenching mechanism. These findings have been confirmed by the binding capacity for the NTB-surfactant combinational system and Stern-Volmer quenching constant (K (sv)) values. The observed depression in binding strength of the counterions with temperature increase favors the promising solubilization of NTB in the palisade layer of micelles leading to penetration binding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据