4.3 Article

Quasi-solid-state pseudocapacitors using proton-conducting gel polymer electrolyte and poly(3-methyl thiophene)-ruthenium oxide composite electrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 465-475

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-013-2276-z

关键词

Supercapacitors; Gel polymer electrolyte; Conducting polymer; Ruthenium oxide; Poly-3-methyl thiophene; Impedance

资金

  1. DST, New Delhi [DST/TSG/PT/2009/93]
  2. University of Delhi [11-17]
  3. CSIR, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the studies on a flexible quasi-solid-state configuration of the redox supercapacitors (pseudocapacitors) assembled with an ionic liquid-based proton conducting non-aqueous gel polymer electrolyte (ILGPE) and composite electrodes of conducting polymer [poly-3-methyl thiophene (pMeT)] and hydrous ruthenium dioxide (RuO2.xH(2)O). The presence of RuO2.xH(2)O in the composite electrodes has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis. The ILGPE films, prepared with the solution of an ionic liquid (1-ethyl 3-methyl imidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate) and a salt ammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate entrapped in a host polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene), have been characterized. The symmetrical pseudocapacitors have been assembled and characterized using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and charge-discharge tests. The composite electrodes with the similar to 13 wt.% hydrous RuO2 loading in pMeT film has shown a maximum specific capacitance value of similar to 118 F g(-1) (of the composite electrode material). The corresponding maximum specific energy and power density have been found to be similar to 12.8 W kg(-1) and similar to 513 W kg(-1), respectively. With further increase in the content of RuO2.xH(2)O, a slight decrease in specific capacitance value has been observed, which indicates the reduction in utilization rate of RuO2.xH(2)O. The composite electrodes show stable capacitance values up to 5,000 charge-discharge cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据