4.6 Article

Vacancy ordering and oxygen dynamics in oxide ion conducting La1-xSrxGa1-xMgxO3-x ceramics: 71Ga, 25Mg and 17O NMR

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 36-43

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2010.10.029

关键词

Sr; and Mg-doped LaGaO3; Ceramics; Perovskite structure; Anion vacancies; NMR Ga-71; O-17; Mg-25

资金

  1. Ural Branch of RAS [09-M-23-2002]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [10-03-01054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oxygen vacancies distribution in the rigid lattice and the thermally activated motion of oxygen atoms are studied in La1-xSrxGa1-xMgxO3-x (x=0.00; 0.05: 0.10; 0.15 and 0.20) compounds. For that Ga-71, Mg-25 and O-17 NMR was performed from 100 K up to 670 K, and ion conductivity measurements were carried out up to 1273 K. The comparison of the electric field gradients at the Ga- and Mg-sites evidences that oxygen vacancies appear exclusively near gallium cations as a species trapped below room temperature in local clusters, GaO5/2-(sic)-GaO5/2. These clusters decay at higher temperature into mobile constituents of the structural octahedra Ga(O-5/6(sic)(1/6))(6/2). At the same time, the nearest octahedral oxygen environment of magnesium cations persists at different doping levels. The case of two adjacent vacant anion sites is found highly unlikely within the studied doping range. The thermally activated oxygen motion starts to develop above room temperature as is observed from both the motional narrowing of O-17 NMR spectra and the O-17 nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate. The obtained results show that two types of motion exist, a slow motion and a fast one. The former is a long-range diffusion whereas the latter is a local back and forth oxygen jumps between two adjacent anion sites. These sites are strongly differentiated by the probability of the vacancy formation, like the vacant apical site and the occupied equatorial site in the orthorhombic compositions x < 0.15. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据